Thursday, October 30, 2008

"What do Guts Have to do with It?"

The concept of our project is to try and explain the shift of belief from pre-cadaver age medicine, to post-cadaver age medicine. Andreas Vesalius was a man ahead of his time. Considered the Father of Modern Anatomy his fascination with the human body began as a student, when he started drawing different parts of the body. This continued with his commission of local artists to draw more accurately and more detailed drawings of the many aspects of the body that he studied. He went on to become a teacher in Italy, where he developed many new teaching techniques. Through his research he began to gain a deep and powerful understanding for how the human body worked, and how we could better understand the inner workings of the body. His teaching practices broke the boundaries of how students were taught. He would have students gather around and watch him dissect bodies, showing them the inner workings of organs, muscles, and tissues. These practices are still used in today’s classrooms. This man is truly a revolutionary mind, his ideas and thoughts have made waves for hundreds of years. Throughout his research and teaching, he wrote a series of books on his findings and techniques. One of the most famous books was De Humani Corporus Fabrica. http://archive.nlm.nih.gov/proj/ttp/flash/vesalius/vesalius.html This is still to this day considered one of the more influential books on anatomy of all time. He went into great detail about each bone, tissue, vein, etc. of the body. His detail and knowledge was unparalleled at the time. It was in this book that the first understandings of mechanical ventilation (artificial breathing) were ever described. At the age of fifty Vesalius died of natural causes. Though he died poor, he left the world of medicine with a wealth of ideas and knowledge. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15378c.htm

6 comments:

Meg said...

I think its so interesting that Andreas Vasalius started his career in the medicine world by simply drawing the body parts. I wonder what the Church thought of these new teaching techniques, and dissecting human remains.

Julianne Godbold said...

Its interesting how during his time period it was unethical to dissect a body whereas today its okay. I would like to know where he received the bodies? And how he got away with dissecting bodies in a classroom when it was unethical?

j.mendel said...

This scientific revolutionary is very similar to ours, William Harvey, who looked at the blood specifically. How was he accepted? Did the general public accept his practices of dissections? Did they appreciate and accept his displays, teachings, and discoveries of the human body?

Matt Schwartz said...

Dissecting human bodies makes perfect sense if you want to learn more about the human body. How did society back then take what he was doing? were they frightened or did they think it made sense like we do today?

Nicole said...

I agree with Julianne about how people during the time period felt about dissecting bodies? I find it amusing to learn how something that is practiced so often today was once so frowned upon. We now know the many benefits of dissecting bodies butI wonder if people saw the benefits a few centuries ago.

raccavallo said...

I know the exploration of the human body involving blood and dissection was very new at this time period... was society opposed to him performing these experiments? Or were they interested to know more about themselves; therefore, were supportive of him research?